For all our talk about family values, the U.S. is actually the worst place to raise a family in the developed world. Anne-Marie Slaughter and Katie Hamm join Nick and Jessyn to explain how our family policies got stuck in the last century, and what we should do about it.

Anne-Marie Slaughter is the President and CEO of New America, a think and action tank dedicated to renewing America in the Digital Age. She is also a professor of politics and international affairs at Princeton University, and from 2009-2011 she served as director of Policy Planning for the U.S. Department of State—the first woman to hold that position.

Twitter: @SlaughterAM

Katie Hamm is the Vice President for Early Childhood Policy at the Center for American Progress, where she leads CAP’s work on policies impacting young children from birth to five.

Twitter: @DCHammslice

Kristine Reeves is a member of the Washington House of Representatives representing the 30th legislative district. She is also the Director of Economic Development for the Military and Defense sector for the state of Washington.

Twitter: @KMReevesWA

Further reading:

A Blueprint for Child Care Reform

The Cost of Inaction on Universal Preschool


Nick Hanauer:               00:04                Hey Pitchfork Economics listeners, we’ve been doing this podcast for a while now and it must be true that some of the stuff we’ve been talking about made no sense, or that you had questions about, so we’re doing an AMA episode when we’ll take any question you have on economics. And what we want to do is rather than have you email them in, we want you to leave a voicemail in a special inbox because that’ll make the episode so much more fun and interesting, so all you need to do is call 731-388-9334, leave your questions. Super excited to hear what you’re thinking, what your questions are, want to know what’s landing and what makes no sense. So again if you’re interested, give us a call 731-388-9334. Thanks again for participating.

Katie Hamm:                 01:02                We live in a country where the vast majority of young children have all available parents working.

Kristine Reeves:            01:08                My husband and I last year alone paid more than $35,000 in child care cost for our two kids.

Nick Hanauer:               01:13                One third of unemployed women in the U.S. left the workforce because of caregiving responsibilities.

Anne-Marie S.:              01:19                We’re not where we should be because society has not made nearly the changes that society needs to make.

Nick Hanauer:               01:26                Virtually all of our peer nations handle this better than we do.

Jessyn Farrell:               01:31                If people are, particularly women, are stepping out of the workforce, that’s money that’s not being spent in local communities.

Announcer 1:                01:44                From the offices of Civic Ventures in downtown Seattle, this is Pitchfork Economics with Nick Hanauer. A conversation about how capitalism actually works.

Nick Hanauer:               02:04                I’m Nick Hanauer, founder of Civic Ventures.

Jessyn Farrell:               02:06                And I’m Jessyn Farrell senior vice president at Civic Ventures and mother of three kids.

Nick Hanauer:               02:15                So today, we’re going to talk about something that affects really every single person in this country, and that is that it’s actually really, really hard to have a family in the United States. That our policy framework is super unfriendly to things like parental leave, child care, flexible scheduling, and so on and so forth. In fact of all the sort of developed nations, we probably have the worst set of policies that are available, which frames up the question for us why does the U.S. hate families?

Jessyn Farrell:               02:48                Yeah, because it really seems like it does when you think about how our policies impact families every single day, it is really hard on people. Whether you are pregnant and needing to just get some time off to be able to go to your prenatal appointment, or even needing to have a glass of water if you might be a pregnant check out worker at a supermarket. We don’t do the prenatal piece well and then that kind of follows all the way through early childhood care up on through policies, even like things ranging from land use. You might spend a lot of time commuting to your job, that’s time away from your family. We do not infuse a family friendly attitude into our policies at all in the country.

Nick Hanauer:               03:28                And at the core of this problem has been this 40-year neoliberalism obsession with extracting as much of the rents in the economy available to big corporations and rich people. And as a consequence, we’ve done two things, we have flatlined wages for workers, which has made costs essentially on a relative basis go up. It’s just harder to afford things. But one of the other really insidious things that that process has done is it has forced all families essentially to be two earner families rather than one earner families, and of course if both people are working, you’re just going to need more child care. And so it’s been this really terrible double whammy for families who earn less on a relative basis and work more.

Jessyn Farrell:               04:20                Yeah, that’s right. And it plays out across the workforce. When I had my second child, I worked at a transit agency. So you had a workforce that had bus drivers, you had more traditional white-collar workers. There was a whole range of job functions at that agency, and the challenges for people with children were really tough. What if you are a breastfeeding mother and having to drive a bus? The agency did not have a way of managing that. But even if you were a breastfeeding mother at a desk job, there was no facility to pump. And then you get into the childcare cost and the dearth of childcare, and it just becomes really hard.

Nick Hanauer:               04:58                Yeah. So Jessyn, I’m a little out of date my kids are older now. Tell me a little bit about how much you and folks around town are paying for childcare.

Jessyn Farrell:               05:07                So it’s insanely expensive. If you have your infant in a full-time childcare center, that’s about $18,000 a year.

Nick Hanauer:               05:15                Wow. If you’re a family of four in Seattle and you have two young kids and you’re earning $80,000 a year, your child care costs border on 50% of your income.

Jessyn Farrell:               05:31                Yeah.

Nick Hanauer:               05:31                And the costs, as I understand it, are after tax.

Jessyn Farrell:               05:37                Right.

Nick Hanauer:               05:37                And you’re income is pre-tax right?

Jessyn Farrell:               05:37                That’s right. Exactly.

Nick Hanauer:               05:38                So it’s probably every bit 50% of your income. That’s just the price to go to work.

Jessyn Farrell:               05:45                Exactly. So the price to go to work is really high. That doesn’t even get into the costs associated with the time. You may not have child care anywhere near where you live because there’s such a child care capacity crisis in urban areas, but also in rural areas. And you know that doesn’t even figure into all the other high cost associated with living in a city like Seattle related to housing and other things.

Jessyn Farrell:               06:10                So the burdens on families are intense, and it forces some families where there’s a choice to have to decide maybe one parent isn’t even going to participate in the workforce, and then that gets at the longer term economic stability of the family, the ability of women to earn on par with their male counterparts because maybe they’re taking that time out because it just doesn’t pencil out in the near-term. So this is something that we really have to figure out because people are really having to make tough and almost impossible economic choices just to show up at work everyday.

Nick Hanauer:               06:42                Yeah. And there’s this amazing statistic, which is that one third of unemployed women in the U.S. left of workforce because of caregiving responsibilities. And as was discussed in our recent pay equity episode, having kids is one of the reasons women don’t earn as much as men and aren’t in those high paying and executive level positions in our society and economy because let’s face it, the responsibilities and burdens of motherhood are huge. It has an enormous effect on the broader economy, not to mention the families themselves-

Jessyn Farrell:               07:15                Their own earning. I mean you know and what that really means then is that when you’re stepping out of the workforce, you are losing out on actual wages and benefits over the course of your lifetime. And you know that’s also saying that our economy and businesses are also losing out on the productivity of employees, on issues related to absenteeism. In fact, U.S. businesses lose approximately $4.4 billion annually because of child care issues and not being able to find adequate childcare.

Nick Hanauer:               07:48                Yeah. One of the things that people often pushback on is that this is too expensive or it’s impossible or whatever it is, but just to be clear, virtually all of our peer nations handle this better than we do, and none of them have turned into poverty-stricken hellholes.

Jessyn Farrell:               08:04                Yeah.

Nick Hanauer:               08:05                You know like all of Western Europe, the Scandinavian countries, Canada, New Zealand, like all of these countries have much better policies, much more generous policies than we have. And as far as I can tell the only difference is that people are just generally happier. It’s just a better system.

Jessyn Farrell:               08:24                And of course, as we know, that when you have money in your pocket, when families have more income, they spend it right in their local communities.

Nick Hanauer:               08:31                So Jessyn today, we’re going to talk about child care and we have a fun guest.

Jessyn Farrell:               08:36                Yeah. This is really exciting. We have Katie Hamm who, is the vice president of Early Childhood Policy at Center for American Progress, where she leads CAP’s work on policies impacting young children from birth to 5.

Nick Hanauer:               08:54                Hey.

Katie Hamm:                 08:55                Hi.

Nick Hanauer:               08:56                It’s Nick Hanauer here. Thank you so much for joining us.

Katie Hamm:                 09:00                Yeah. Thanks for having me.

Jessyn Farrell:               09:01                So for someone who has maybe never given a lot of though to this issue, tell us why early learning and childcare matter. Give us the elevator speech.

Katie Hamm:                 09:13                Sure. So we live in a country where the vast majority of young children have all available parents working, which means that they are going to be spending a significant amount of time in the care of somebody other than their parent. And the child care that we have to support families in this country is really lacking. We have kind of his arbitrary idea that education starts when children are 5 or 6, and it’s just not true. We now have decades of brain development science that shows that those early years are actually when children’s brains are developing and informing the foundation that’s going to set them up for success in life or not. So we really need to be working much earlier and we need to be looking at the quality of those experiences that children have, especially when they’re in the care of somebody other than their parent.

Nick Hanauer:               10:03                It strikes me Katie that one of the things that makes this issue so much more pressing than it was say 40 years ago, at the dawn of the neoliberal era is that in the ’60s and ’70s, one person in a family could have a job and the salary that they brought home would sustain the family. And so that usually meant that the mother would be able to stay home and take care of the kids and take up a lot of that work and that now you really can’t afford to do that. That now we have an economy where in order to sustain a middle class life in general, both people have to work. And obviously, that’s you know left little kids at home alone.

Katie Hamm:                 10:53                Yeah. I mean I think that the economic conditions that families are facing have shifted for sure. I think it’s important in this conversation too that we think about women of color, who have been in the workforce for a long time. And it’s interesting that you bring up the 1970s because the U.S. actually got really really close to universal childcare in the 1970s.

Katie Hamm:                 11:17                There was a universal child care bill that passed Congress, that President Nixon was expected to sign, and Pat Buchanan, he was an advisor at the time, convinced him that this was a communist plan and that he should veto it. In the end, he vetoed it. He linked childcare to communism, and we’re just kind of now able to have another big conversation about what should we do to solve the child care crisis.

Jessyn Farrell:               11:47                If you could change things in the system right now, what would you do? I mean I know that from having kids myself, the issue of child care deserts, it’s really often workers aren’t compensated at the right level living wage. There’s the issues of quality. What would you change? Where would you start?

Katie Hamm:                 12:09                So I think I’d start by rethinking about how we invest in young children and not making that really false distinction between K-12 education and early childhood education. So I would think about investing the same amount of money for young children and so having a mechanism in place that allows a public investment in kids birth to five, funds a lot of different options for parents, and parents want a home-based childcare program, some parents want a center-based program.

Katie Hamm:                 12:45                And I think when you do that and you invest in quality standards in place and you improve the wages of the workers. As you noted, the average wage for a child care educator in this country is $10 an hour. If you do those things, if you have the financing in place, if you address the quality, if you address the wages, then you can build supply, and you can get to a place where it’s not unaffordable, it’s considered a public good like other services that are available to families like K-12 education. So I that’s where I would start.

Nick Hanauer:               13:25                Katie, do you have a sense for how much … Have you guys done an analysis of how much it would cost to enact a robust federal child care program?

Katie Hamm:                 13:36                So I haven’t done that research, but the National Academy of Sciences has and their estimate is that to have a high quality child care program in this country for kids birth to 5, we would need a $140 billion per year. That’s not necessarily all public funding. You would have potentially parents paying a co-payment, you would have state and local resources going to it, but that’s the price tag. It’s not cheap.

Nick Hanauer:               14:02                Well, it is cheap compared to what we spend annually on stock buybacks.

Katie Hamm:                 14:07                Absolutely.

Jessyn Farrell:               14:08                Right. The prison industrial complex and this stuff pays for itself, right?

Nick Hanauer:               14:13                Right.

Jessyn Farrell:               14:13                So maybe we don’t need to obsess about how much it cost because we know, you mentioned this that investments early on are the ones that pay off the most as kids get older. So I think you make really a great point around how we start to think of this as just part of our education system. What’s controversial about that? That seems to me to be so pragmatic. What are some of the obstacles?

Katie Hamm:                 14:37                You know I think when we talk to policymakers about this issue, first of all, I will say that there is growing support and growing recognition across political parties. This is an issue. This is something that families can’t just be expected to handle on their own, that it’s generating inequality before kids even start kindergarten. The things that we hear about the most are generally around cost. I think of that that argument from the 1970s that this is an affront to the family. That’s still alive today. There is still an undercurrent sometimes of well, mom should be home, or this isn’t the role of government. But I do think that’s changing. I think even compared to 10 years ago, we’re hearing is less and less.

Jessyn Farrell:               15:24                And why do you think is the narrative replacement? If we all agree that those two stories are old and should be discarded, what do you think is the narrative replacement? How should we be talking about this?

Katie Hamm:                 15:36                I think it’s about economic policy. If we all want to have an economy that’s strong and thriving, and we want parents and families to be economically secure, and we want people to be able to have children and raise them to be successful citizens, that means we have to start investing in children from their earliest days and years. We have a mountain of evidence that when you invest in early childhood programs, more parents are able to work and children enter school ready to learn. And so it’s a two-fer, you can both grow the economy today and you can set your community, your state, your country up for economic success in the future and having a really robust workforce in the future.

Nick Hanauer:               16:27                Interesting. So tell us a little bit about what’s happening in our peer countries. You know there are countries that have these systems in place to a greater or lesser degree, that ideally we could learn from. Who do you look to or what do you look to as examples of stuff that’s working?

Katie Hamm:                 16:47                Yes. So you know Scandinavian countries in Western Europe, not surprisingly made some of these investments long ago and don’t differentiate between elementary school and early childhood. They have robust family leave plans that allow parents to stay home when their children are young. And then they have early education starting 2, 3, sometimes younger. And even countries that have smaller economies like in South America or in some Asian countries, they are starting to invest in early childhood in a really robust way.

Katie Hamm:                 17:33                Quebec has a universal child care program that provides subsidy to families to help them afford child care that they’ve had for decades. So there’s no shortage of models out there when it comes to kind of developing a robust early childhood program.

Katie Hamm:                 17:52                We have some states that have led the way on pre-K. So you have states like Georgia and Oklahoma that serve most of their four year olds in a public pre-K program. And then you have cities like D.C. in New York also have robust preschool program. So we’re getting there on early education. I don’t think we have a state yet that kind of has the full birth to five piece and it’s parents with infants and toddlers that often struggle the most to find child care and to pay for it. So we still have a ways to go.

Jessyn Farrell:               18:23                You know one of the things I thought you might talk about is the U.S. military system and the child care that we do. So in some ways, we have a great model in the U.S. Can you talk a little bit about what happens with the military and how child care is provided?

Katie Hamm:                 18:37                Yeah. That’s a great point. I’m glad you brought that up. So the U.S. military has a child care program. In the 1990s, basically the lack of child care support in the military was considered a national security threat. And so they built a program that would support family and allow parents to work. All parents pay on a sliding scale. They have quality standards that everybody has to meet. They have credentials that early educators attain so that they learn the skills that it takes to work with young children. Parents [inaudible 00:19:12] home based program centers, they have resources and lending libraries that providers can use. And I think people are pretty happy with it. I think the parents are happy, I think the educators are generally pretty happy in that system. So it exists across the country on military bases and it’s just something that can be done.

Nick Hanauer:               19:34                Would it be plausible to just take the military system and extend it to the rest of the country?

Katie Hamm:                 19:39                You know I think that that model and kind of principles that guide it are definitely scalable. I think when it comes to oversight and some of the infrastructure that you need to get there, we have some work to do on that, but I think the principle of limiting what families pay, putting quality standards in place and increasing wages and putting everybody kind of on a wage scale is certainly doable.

Jessyn Farrell:               20:05                Yeah. It sure seems like it. We do it and it’s just a matter of of obviously figuring out how to make it work across the country. One of the things that I think is really interesting is there are some really great things that work in the United States, particularly I think the flexibility that there are lots of different kinds of child care options. There’s the issue of culturally appropriate child care that’s provided, particularly in immigrant communities. And so I’m wondering if you can speak a little bit about that, and what might happen to those kinds of programs if we were to implement universal public child care.

Katie Hamm:                 20:44                Yeah. So you know you’re right, we do have a lot of different programs in this country and parents kind of … They have options and they don’t. I think like a robust child care system doesn’t leave people behind who are currently providing child care. And I think that’s why it’s really important when you lay out a vision for child care, if you’re asking for higher quality standards, for more credentials that there are resources and supports to help people get there. A lot of child care providers right now are doing the best they can with very few resources. It’s what’s really important.

Katie Hamm:                 21:22                We have a really diverse early childhood workforce that reflects the diversity of young children in this country who are not majority white. And so that’s a real strength of the early child system. The diversity, the languages, racial diversity that we have in the early childhood system. And so we want to think about how do we move everyone forward towards more quality, towards more options and sustainability without losing the great diversity that they bring to the table. And I think that comes through being really intentional about before you ask people to meet standards or before you ask them to get that degree or credential, you need to provide scholarships, tuition assistance, paid release time, resources to help them go through different processes that can build quality in their programs.

Jessyn Farrell:               22:14                So if you could wave a wand and make one big change first, what would you do?

Katie Hamm:                 22:20                I would significantly increase the wages so that we can retain a very highly qualified and stable early childhood workforce. The biggest predictor of quality in a childcare setting is that interaction between a child and an adult, and when we pay people sub poverty wages, it’s just all that more challenging to get to high quality. So that’s what I’d do.

Nick Hanauer:               22:48                Yeah. That’s interesting.

Jessyn Farrell:               22:48                Yeah. That sounds like a good first step.

Nick Hanauer:               22:50                Yeah. Cool. Thank you so much for joining us Katie.

Katie Hamm:                 22:54                Okay. Thank you. Bye.

Nick Hanauer:               22:55                Okay. Take care.

Sara Lee B.:                   23:03                It’s one thing to talk about what you can do in the face of something as large as how the American economy hates families, but it’s another thing to actually work on fixing that.

Sara Lee B.:                   23:14                Hi, my name is Sara Lee [Bovich 00:23:15] and I’m a producer here on Pitchfork Economics. And I got the chance to sit down and talk to Washington state representative Christine Reeves, who is actively working on legislation that could really have a positive impact on the kind of issues that we talk about when we talk about how America hates families.

Kristine Reeves:            23:36                Hi Sara, how are you?

Sara Lee B.:                   23:37                Good. How are you?

Kristine Reeves:            23:37                Christine Reeves. Nice to meet you. Come on in. Have a seat.

Sara Lee B.:                   23:40                We know that most of the remaining gender pay gap is created when women have children and leave the workforce, either temporarily or permanently. How can state or federal policies helped to make the labor force more fair for working moms and for parents in general?

Kristine Reeves:            23:55                Well, that’s a loaded question, but I think there’s a lot of different ways that we can do that. I’m a working mom myself. I have a four-year-old and a six-year-old, and like a lot of working families, my husband and I are very fortunate that we have a dual income, but we had to have that conversation when are kids came. And surprisingly I’m actually the primary income earner in my family and so the conversation wasn’t about whether or not I would leave the workforce, it was about whether or not my husband would leave the workforce. Because essentially his salary was the full cast of our child care bill. And I think a lot of folks are having those conversations. Unfortunately, disproportionately that conversation usually impacts moms over dads. And so that means that we’re losing more women in the workforce who choose to stay home with their kids because the balancing of the budget just doesn’t work out.

Kristine Reeves:            24:37                There’s a lot of ways that we can be helpful. So we know right now that child care cost actually exceed the cost of sending your kids to college in a lot of places. And so we’ve got to figure out how to kind of wrap all of these things together in a way, that make sure that women aren’t being disproportionately impacted when we’re asking folks to think about their future and how we invest in our kids.

Kristine Reeves:            24:58                So obviously, I think a lot of people assume that because I’m a working mom and have kids of my own, that this really came up. Because my husband and I last year alone, paid more than $35,000 in child care cost for our two kids, which is crazy when you think about it, right? That’s more than a third of my income going to that one thing. And when you have a mortgage payment and a car payment. Like a lot of families, I have $180,000 in student loan debt that I’m also trying to pay off. It gets challenging to really make ends meet.

Sara Lee B.:                   25:25                It does lead to like an interesting dichotomy of child care is so expensive and yet child care providers, the majority of whom are women, are so poorly paid. How do you find that balance of creating child care that is affordable, but still respecting and creating a good space for the people who provide that child care?

Kristine Reeves:            25:44                I think that’s an excellent question and I come to find out that early childhood educators, child care providers are actually representative of the communities in which they work. So it’s not just women, but it’s women of color, it’s new Americans of different backgrounds with multiple language sets. And we know that 90% of kid’s brain development happens in the age of 0 to 5. And so when we think about how we’ve just made historic investments in our K through 12 systems, $7.5 billion last year, but we know that 47% of our kids aren’t coming to school kindergarten ready. And that are kindergarten classrooms don’t necessarily always reflect the communities in which folks are living.

Kristine Reeves:            26:22                We know that we’ve got to figure out how to replicate the model in early learning and spread that across the entire education system. But to your point, the challenge is how you get high quality early childhood educators when some of them are being paid less than dog groomers in our state. So for me, it’s about how do we make sure that we’re actually compensating teachers to the standards that we’re asking them to have and we’ve got a lot of standards in Washington around early childhood education. So it’s how are we making sure that those wages actually demonstrate the value that we’ve asked these early childhood educators to have, but also again at the end of the day, it’s how do we make sure that they can feed their families too, that they can put a roof over their head. Especially when we’re asking them to take care of our kids. We want them to also be able to take care of their kids. And so part of this cost model conversation has to be about how we make sure we were finding balance in that budget question I guess.

Sara Lee B.:                   27:10                So let’s go into a little bit of the specifics of what you’ve been working on. What is the Mom Agenda?

Kristine Reeves:            27:16                Yeah. So the Working Moms Agenda actually has a couple different pieces of legislation attached to it. So some of the bigger items on the agenda focus on sales tax exemptions. So one sales tax exemption for diapers. As you know, if you’ve had kids, diapers are fairly expensive as it is. It’s not something that … It’s not luxury. I can’t just let my kid walk around without a diaper on. If your kid is in childcare, you don’t have an option to send them to school with cloth diapers. You have to use disposable diapers and this was just one way, as you’re thinking about how you balance your family’s budget, that we thought we might be able to shave off some cost savings for for working families.

Kristine Reeves:            27:54                The second item on the agenda is what we call the tampon tax. It’s really around taking the sales tax off feminine hygiene or menstrual products, and making sure that those are a little bit more affordable. Again, similar concept around diapers. These are not luxury items. These aren’t things that I can go through my family budget and say, “I’m just going to live without that for a month.” So looking at ways that again, we could kind of try to find a little bit of cost savings in a family’s budget.

Kristine Reeves:            28:18                We also have a big bill that’s actually on the House floor calendar around diaper changing stations. My husband actually brought this issue up and talked to a lot of working dads that when you go out to spend time with your family in public places and restaurants in particular, women’s restrooms might have diaper changing stations, but you always find that the guys’ rooms don’t. And so my husband was super frustrated that he couldn’t contribute to the family conversation and then I ended up doing kind of the burden of diaper changing. And so introduce a bill to make sure that restaurants who are serving children’s menus are complying and making sure that they’re including diaper changing stations in all of their restrooms.

Kristine Reeves:            28:55                And then the biggest one and this is my favorite one to talk about, is how we make child care more accessible and affordable for working families. And so we’ve actually introduced a series of bills, but the bill that just passed House Bill 1344, it’s known as the Washington Child Care Access Now Act sets a very bold vision for the state of Washington to look at how we would cap child care expenses at 7% of a family’s income. It looks at how he would make sure that were compensating that early education workforce that the rate that they actually deserve commensurate with their education. And then looks at making sure that we’re expanding facility access while ensuring quality of care.

Kristine Reeves:            29:29                So it’s a bold vision for the state of Washington. It’s something that I’m really proud of the work that our business partners, our business community have come to the table over the last year around the child’s care collaborative task force. It’s a bill that we passed last year to bring the business community to table to say, “Hey guys, you’ve been missing from this conversation.” Under no faults of their own, but we wanted to make sure that they got an invite and we started thinking strategically about how businesses can also help us solve this problem. Because this is no longer just a mom issue, this is an economy issue, this is a working families issue, and this is an employer issue. And so I’m really excited. It’s a pretty big bold agenda, but I think it’s time for us to have a conversation around how working moms deserve a little bit of attention on some of the policies that we do down here.

Sara Lee B.:                   30:09                Have you gotten any pushback on this bill? I feel like all of those should be things that everyone supports.

Kristine Reeves:            30:15                I wouldn’t say pushback is the right word, but I think there’s rightly so questions and comments. It seems rather obvious to those of us who have kids and childcare, and those of us who are raising families that these seem like good common sense bills. But what I would tell you is there’s definitely a conversation about, is this government overreach? Is this taking away folks’ personal accountability and responsibility for their own budgets? In the childcare conversation, there’s definitely questions about whether or not the state has over regulated the market and if that’s part of the reason that we’re challenged with the supply and demand issue. And it’s a different conversation than we’ve had in Olympia.

Kristine Reeves:            30:50                Since getting here, we’ve really change the conversation from how we’re focusing on just the early learning curriculum and the things we’re teaching our kids and to more of a comprehensive systems approach around the fact that child care really is early learning, and if the child care system isn’t working, then early learning, we’re not getting anybody the early learning that they need. And again, it goes back to that, then we’re missing 47% of our youngest learners aren’t coming to school kindergarten ready.

Kristine Reeves:            31:15                I mean I don’t know if you know this, but our state budget. About 53% of our state’s budget goes to K through 12 education, about 15% of it goes to higher education opportunities, only 1.8% of our state budget goes to early childhood education. And yet, we know that 90% of a kid’s brain development happens in 0 to 5. So we want to talk about things like closing the opportunity gap and making sure that the children farthest from opportunity get best start. This is one of the ways that we’re going to know that we’ve hit it, if you will, when those kids are actually showing up to school ready to learn.

Nick Hanauer:               31:48                For sure we have a lot to do, but folks like Representative Reeves, at least in Washington state, are clearly making these issues a priority and we have to support her here and the legislation she’s working on at the state level. And folks should support and states across the country similar legislation to hopefully make some of this happen around the country.

Jessyn Farrell:               32:12                We talked to Anne-Marie Slaughter, who is the president and CEO of New America. She was formerly the first female director of policy planning at the State Department under Secretary Clinton. And after her 2012 article, Why Women Still Can’t Have It All became the most read article in the history of the Atlantic, she’s emerged as an advocate for family-friendly policies.

Nick Hanauer:               32:37                You had to either, I’m not sure if it’s good fortune or bad fortune to write the most read article in the Atlantic’s history, wasn’t it? Why Women Still Can’t Have It All kicked up quite a thing at the time, I remember reading it. So let’s start by asking the question, can women have it all now yet?

Anne-Marie S.:              33:02                No, but I would say nobody can have it all. It’s funny that article was entitled, Why Women Still Can’t Have It All and it was actually intended to say, we’re not where we should be because society has not made nearly the changes that society needs to make. And of course, that nuance was lost on most of the audience. And so I now get introduced as the woman who thinks women can’t have it all. And I think you know we need massive social change so that all of us, men and women, can have the joys of our families, whether constructed or biological or our communities and fulfilling work. And that’s really what what it means, but we’re a long way from that for both sexes.

Anne-Marie S.:              33:52                You know in the first place I think we are still making economic policy as if we were in the 1950s. We are still assuming that there is a person, a woman at home to do all the hard work of making a home caring for children, caring for elders, doing the domestic side of what every person in the workforce needs. And that was never true for working class women, women of color, but it was true for middle class and upper middle class white women in the 1950s. We are now almost at 2020. The only way that middle class families have stayed afloat has been to send women into the workforce, which has been good for lots of women, but it has made family finances even more precarious because there isn’t a safety net now if something happens to either parent. And we don’t have childcare, we don’t have family leave, we don’t have elder care family accounts, any of the things that clearly a society that thought, well everybody in this society is producing income, working for income some part of the time, clearly they also … We have to have a system of care, that kind of work that generally doesn’t get paid.

Jessyn Farrell:               35:21                You know I read your article in 2012. I was running for office the very first time. I had a two-year-old in a four-year-old and as we were doorbelling my neighborhood, I would often get the question, “Well, who’s going to take care of your kids when you’re down in Olympia in the legislature?” Recognizing of course that my male colleagues were probably not getting that question. And so you make this great point around caregiving and how that has to become something that is valued both for men and women, right? I think that’s part of the key here. We named this episode, Why Does the U.S. Hate Families, but at the same time so much of this still is about women. Do you think that anything has changed in the last six years or is it … Are the circumstances that gave rise to your article in 2012 still the same? I should say seven years as they are in 2019.

Anne-Marie S.:              36:10                Yup. I mean I think it is getting better as millennial men move into their parenting years, they are much more engaged. The women they’re marrying are much savvier about what can happen if you don’t set patterns of equality very, very early.

Anne-Marie S.:              36:36                I always use the example of it’s like doing the taxes, whichever member of a couple does the taxes the first time he or she will do them forever more. And child care is similar pattern. You have to get into those rhythms early. And also 40% of women are the primary breadwinner in their households. Now a lot of those are single mothers, but a lot are not. So that’s changing too, but we still don’t have either the infrastructure of care that we need nor do we have the social attitudes that recognized that investing in the next generation is just as important as investing money for pay.

Nick Hanauer:               37:24                Right. So one the questions I have, and to be clear, let me just say, I think it’s worth underscoring that we idealize the 1950s, right?

Anne-Marie S.:              37:36                Yes, we do.

Nick Hanauer:               37:38                But just for purposes of discussion, let’s accept that stylized, idealized idea in our heads that you know you had an economy which permitted one person to go to work and earn a living and another person, whether it was a man or a woman frankly, stay home and do the care work. And we had that for a period of time, and we set up a bunch of norms of behavior and policies to support that construct. You know a question in my head is, would you want to go back to an economy where a family could support itself with one earner and one person could stay home and do all the care work? Would that be a good thing? I mean there are a couple of levers here to pull, right?

Nick Hanauer:               38:27                One is to try to return to an economic construct that permits that arrangement, another is to accommodate the existing economic construct, which does not permit that for most people, where for most families both people have to work. And then you account for care in a different way. So if Anne-Marie was in charge of everything, what would you do?

Anne-Marie S.:              38:52                So I would create an economy where 50 hours of work a week would support a family. And then I would create the social norms that said how you divide those 50 hours between two people is entirely up to them, and is dependent on their personalities and their desires rather than their genders. It would be better if we had jobs that were sufficient to make more room for care. And so 40 hours, 50 hours, but you then could divide them so that men and women, say between whenever it’s 25 to 55, our prime childbearing, child-rearing years that everyone would say during that period, or indeed when you’re caring for your own parents or other relatives, I can continue working and growing. Although perhaps not as steep as slope as without children and I also have time to invest in my children, which of course is investing in ourselves as well. It’s some of the most rewarding things I’ve done in my life are investing in my children, parenting, seeing myself reflected in their eyes, but also the enormous pleasure of watching them grow. And it’s not just my kids, it’s also students.

Anne-Marie S.:              40:23                So I would want a world in which as I said, two people who work somewhere between 40 and 60 hours a week were able to do that to support themselves and have time for care.

Jessyn Farrell:               40:34                I really like that. You identify so clearly the nexus between time and the ability to care for your family. And that’s something that we don’t elevate in the conversation around work enough. We talk about compensation, we talk about providing childcare benefits, and we talk about, to some lesser extent, the limitations on an individual’s work, but a family, a couple, economic units limitations on time are really not something that are part of our cultural dialogue. And I wonder how you interrupt our cultural obsession with wedding ourselves to work and this place that we need to get to, which that we actually have time allocated amongst two people to be able to care for our families?

Anne-Marie S.:              41:19                I mean this is really a tough one. And I tell people that in the time since I wrote my article in 2012 to publishing a book called Unfinished Business in 2015, I had to deprogram myself as a workaholic and as somebody who absolutely had been conditioned to believe that work for pay was valuable and care work was not. To somebody who now really believes that, from the point of view of our national security, our economy and frankly morality in the sense of of being able to close inequality gaps, that that care work is every bit as important as the other work that we do. But we are a nation who absolutely pride ourselves on being able to say we work as close to 24 hours a day as humanly possible. And yet, that is sharply at variance with the family values that we also say that we upholds.

Anne-Marie S.:              42:28                So the way I think about it when I talk to audiences or try to convince people is to get them to understand that care work is investing in others just as career work is investing in yourself. And that a good life involves a balance between the two, for you as much as for the people you’re caring for. And I think people don’t think of it that way. And they they think care work is only physical. Bathing and dressing and feeding. A, that’s only a relatively small part and B, even that kind of physical work is the platform on which you teach your children or you engage people. You actually have that fabric of human interaction, which is deeply satisfying to both parties. I mean not every minute of every day, I’m realistic, but it is ultimately at the end of our lives that human connection that we forge is as important to us as our bank accounts.

Nick Hanauer:               43:30                Absolutely. Rereading your article reminded me of the extraordinary amount of effort that my wife and I had to apply, as apparently you did, to getting our son to do and turn in his homework.

Anne-Marie S.:              43:49                Oh, yes.

Nick Hanauer:               43:50                And one of the really profound sort of lessons that I’ve taken away from raising children is if it was as hard as it was for my family … By the way, my wife did not work. And where all the resources in the world were at our disposal. It was that hard for us to get our son to do his homework and turn it in. The challenges for a family with less resources and less flexibility than us, it’s just insane, right? And we just have to find a way to confront that reality and those difficulties.

Nick Hanauer:               44:28                I do find myself retreating sometimes with respect issues like this to ideas like, should we pay people for care work? Would it be helpful to give giant tax exemptions for instance to people who choose to stay home and care for their children? Is that a good idea or a bad idea?

Anne-Marie S.:              44:53                Well, this is tricky. And again, we should not assume that policy changes will do all the work for us. Indeed as we were just saying, you got ask, “Who’s going to stay with your children when you’re going down to Olympia?” Men didn’t get asked that. We have a lot of work to do around cultural expectations as to who is going to do care work or those kinds of tax exemptions will in fact drive women out of the workforce and into the home. And unless we do this equally, we’re going to be going backwards.

Anne-Marie S.:              45:33                But there’s also the point of not commoditizating everything. To think of care as a commodity like any other. So you pay for your groceries and you pay for care. No, care is the heart of human connection. I think care jobs should be far better paid. And I think people who are caring for others should be part of Social Security. I think their work should be seen and valued, but I don’t think it only has to be valued in money. And I’d much rather have a world in which people looked at someone who did only worked and said, “What a narrow sad human being. What a person who’s missing out on some of the best life has to offer.” That would be a better change than suddenly saying, “Well, you know care work is working, we’re just going to pay for it no matter who does it.”

Nick Hanauer:               46:28                Yeah.

Jessyn Farrell:               46:29                One of the things I’ve been thinking about in listening to you speak about this is that it’s not just that we need this cultural interruption of that situation, but also that the way we apply it from a policy standpoint by sector really matters. What does the ability to have more time for your family in the construction sector look like versus in a state legislature versus in academia? And so how do you balance I think the need for nuance by sector with this more broad universal value of elevating care as an important thing?

Anne-Marie S.:              47:06                I think you’re right to point out that different sectors do need to be treated differently. I mean I was an academic for 20 years and that’s kind of the perfect, flexible arrangement that is also high prestige and high paid where you have to show up to teach classes and you have to show up for certain meanings, but other than that, you are paid for what you produce in terms of being a good scholar, doing your research, teaching good classes, but on your own time. But that would not work in construction. You can’t just say, “Okay, the roofer is going to come in whenever she wants to and the plumber’s going to come in whenever he wants to.” You won’t get a house.

Anne-Marie S.:              47:50                So I think in some ways, we need to say that good work. Let’s think about good work for everyone in our society. Good work is work that allows you to grow in your work and to maximize your productivity and your personal development, but also to have other parts of a life. And again, not everybody’s going to have kids, although everybody has parents. But other people are going to want to invest in their communities and invest in others in different ways. But then different sectors will have to be able to adjust as they need to, and we may need to do things like have a family care account, where this is something Ai-jen Poo and the national coalition for domestic workers and the organization caring across generations have suggested, that the equivalent of Social Security in this century should be a care account, where the government would send some money and you put in some money where you have the ability to take time out as you needed. Some of that will be emergency, but some of that will simply be being able to go be home at 3 o’clock when your kids come home from school, and then go back online later when you need to. Again, that doesn’t work for building a house, but there’s a lot that it can work for.

Jessyn Farrell:               49:12                And that’s definitely one element, the ability to take the time. But as you’re talking about a roofer or even a state legislator or anyone else, any female, you would want to make sure that that roofer is able to pump, should she have a baby. So there are all of these really specific nuances that go into creating a society that actually allows for work and the economic self-determination that comes from being able to have a job.

Nick Hanauer:               49:37                Right.

Anne-Marie S.:              49:37                Exactly.

Nick Hanauer:               49:38                Yeah. So this was a fantastic chat. Thank you so much for taking time out of your very, very busy day to chat with us about these issues. They’re super important.

Jessyn Farrell:               49:47                It’s so great to get to talk to you.

Nick Hanauer:               49:49                Yeah. Thank you Anne-Marie.

Anne-Marie S.:              49:51                It’s really a pleasure. Thank you.

Nick Hanauer:               49:53                Talk soon. Okay.

Anne-Marie S.:              49:53                Okay.

Nick Hanauer:               49:54                Buh-bye.

Anne-Marie S.:              49:55                Bye.

Jessyn Farrell:               49:59                Those are great discussions on how tough it is for families to have economic security in the United States relating to childcare, paid family leave. There’s just a bunch of stuff that we are not doing right.

Nick Hanauer:               50:12                Yes, indeed. And it really does sort of come down to who do we collectively want to be able to participate in the economy and at what cost because even when people sort of have the permission to participate in the economy if the trade-offs make no sense, then they rightly won’t. I just don’t think that makes any sense whatsoever.

Jessyn Farrell:               50:35                And there’s this really interesting intersection between cost and time that both interviews alluded to. Anne-Marie Slaughter talked about what would it look like if we had families work just 50 hours a week between two parents so that they could really be able to care for their family and if pay them enough so that it would work that way. And then of course we had Katie Hamm talking about just how expensive child care is and how hard it is to find child care. And so there’s this intersection between the time and cost burden that we’re placing on families that just makes it really tough.

Jessyn Farrell:               51:07                And then the other thing that I thought was really interesting about Katie’s interview was this idea that there’s this arbitrary distinction between education starting at 5 as just you know this age. Clearly, in another era, when we’re inventing public education, that was a cut off that seemed to make sense, but we no longer live in an agrarian society that’s based on agricultural cycles. So we need to really update our notion of when education starts based on science, and we know that that starts as soon as infants are born.

Nick Hanauer:               51:41                That’s right. And in an economy that makes it unambiguously difficult for single earner families to survive, where we’ve suppress wages in a way that make it necessary for both parents, given that there are two parents, need to be in the workforce in order to live stable, secured, dignified lives. We have to come up with a way to support families who have children.

Jessyn Farrell:               52:06                Yeah.

Nick Hanauer:               52:06                You can’t have it both ways. You can’t want an economy where everybody has to work all the time and not support child care in some way shape or form.

Jessyn Farrell:               52:15                Right. And even to take that a little wider lens. I mean I think our contention is that you can have great, thriving economy and have families that are able to do what they need to do to support each other.

Nick Hanauer:               52:26                And in fact, the two are in a feedback loop with one another.

Jessyn Farrell:               52:28                Exactly.

Nick Hanauer:               52:29                The stronger the families are, the stronger the economy will be. And again Jessyn, let’s not forget that it’s not just about child care, it’s also about scheduling practices. It’s about an overtime threshold that either gets you home after eight hours of work, or pays you a lot for the sacrifices you’re making to be there for more than eight hours certainly helps you pay for the child care necessary to stay overtime. It’s about paid family leave, it’s about all the other things that go into having a stable and secure family life while participating in the workforce.

Jessyn Farrell:               53:02                Yeah. That’s exactly right. I mean at the of the day, this is really about the workplace needing to adapt to the 21st century.

Jessyn Farrell:               53:10                On the next episode of Pitchfork Economics, Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal explains what centrism actually is.

Annie:                          53:25                Pitchfork Economics is produced by Civic Ventures. The magic happens in Seattle in partnership with Larj Media, that’s L-A-R-J Media and The Young Turks Network.

Annie:                          53:33                Find us on Twitter and Facebook at Civic Action and follow our writing on Medium at Civic Skunkworks, and you should also follow Nick Hanauer on Twitter @NickHanauer.

Annie:                          53:42                As always, a big thank you to our guests and thank you to our team at Civic Ventures. Nick Hanauer, Zack Silk, Jasmin Weaver, Jessyn Farrell, Stephanie Ervin, David Goldstein, Paul Constant, Nick Cassella and Annie Fadely. Thanks for listening.


Comments (187)
  1. I simply want to tell you that I am new to blogging and certainly savored your page. Likely I’m want to bookmark your blog post . You surely come with remarkable writings. Thanks for sharing your webpage.

  2. Excellent read, I just passed this onto a colleague who was doing some research on that. And he actually bought me lunch since I found it for him smile So let me rephrase that: Thank you for lunch! “No one can wear a mask for very long.” by Seneca.

  3. Wow! This can be one particular of the most beneficial blogs We have ever arrive across on this subject. Basically Excellent. I am also a specialist in this topic therefore I can understand your effort.

  4. Thanks for your fascinating article. One other problem is that mesothelioma cancer is generally due to the inhalation of fibers from mesothelioma, which is a cancer causing material. It can be commonly seen among personnel in the structure industry who have long experience of asbestos. It can also be caused by living in asbestos insulated buildings for a long period of time, Inherited genes plays a crucial role, and some persons are more vulnerable on the risk in comparison with others.

  5. I like what you guys are up too. Such smart work and reporting! Carry on the superb works guys I have incorporated you guys to my blogroll. I think it’ll improve the value of my site 🙂

  6. I simply couldn’t leave your site before suggesting that I really loved the standard information a person supply in your guests? Is going to be back steadily to inspect new posts.

  7. Hello there! This is kind of off topic but I need some advice from an established blog. Is it hard to set up your own blog? I’m not very techincal but I can figure things out pretty fast. I’m thinking about setting up my own but I’m not sure where to start. Do you have any tips or suggestions? Thanks

  8. Hey there just wanted to give you a quick heads up and let you know a few of the pictures aren’t loading properly. I’m not sure why but I think its a linking issue. I’ve tried it in two different web browsers and both show the same outcome.

  9. I simply desired to say thanks once again. I am not sure what I would have followed without those methods discussed by you relating to such a concern. This was the difficult matter in my circumstances, nevertheless seeing the expert approach you handled it forced me to cry with fulfillment. Now i’m happier for the work and thus have high hopes you recognize what an amazing job that you are getting into educating others by way of a site. I’m certain you have never encountered all of us.

  10. It’s really a nice and useful piece of information. I am satisfied that you shared this helpful info with us. Please stay us up to date like this. Thank you for sharing.

  11. Good – I should certainly pronounce, impressed with your web site. I had no trouble navigating through all the tabs as well as related information ended up being truly simple to do to access. I recently found what I hoped for before you know it in the least. Reasonably unusual. Is likely to appreciate it for those who add forums or something, web site theme . a tones way for your client to communicate. Excellent task.

  12. I’m not sure where you’re getting your information, but good topic. I needs to spend some time learning more or understanding more. Thanks for wonderful info I was looking for this information for my mission.

  13. Thanks for every other informative web site. The place else may I get that type of info written in such a perfect means? I have a project that I am simply now working on, and I’ve been on the look out for such information.

  14. Today, I went to the beach with my children. I found a sea shell and gave it to my 4 year old daughter and said “You can hear the ocean if you put this to your ear.” She put the shell to her ear and screamed. There was a hermit crab inside and it pinched her ear. She never wants to go back! LoL I know this is completely off topic but I had to tell someone!

  15. Write more, thats all I have to say. Literally, it seems as though you relied on the video to make your point. You definitely know what youre talking about, why waste your intelligence on just posting videos to your weblog when you could be giving us something informative to read?

  16. It’s appropriate time to make some plans for the future and it is time to be happy. I’ve read this post and if I could I want to suggest you some interesting things or advice. Perhaps you can write next articles referring to this article. I desire to read more things about it!

  17. What i don’t realize is in fact how you are no longer actually a lot more smartly-appreciated than you may be right now. You’re very intelligent. You know therefore considerably on the subject of this topic, produced me in my opinion consider it from a lot of varied angles. Its like men and women are not fascinated unless it’s something to do with Woman gaga! Your individual stuffs outstanding. All the time deal with it up!

  18. I’m not sure where you’re getting your information, but good topic. I needs to spend some time learning much more or understanding more. Thanks for great information I was looking for this information for my mission.

  19. What i don’t realize is in truth how you’re not really a lot more well-favored than you may be right now. You are so intelligent. You understand thus considerably in the case of this subject, produced me personally imagine it from a lot of numerous angles. Its like men and women don’t seem to be fascinated unless it is something to do with Woman gaga! Your individual stuffs great. Always care for it up!

  20. Also I believe that mesothelioma is a extraordinary form of cancer that is generally found in those previously exposed to asbestos. Cancerous cellular material form in the mesothelium, which is a shielding lining that covers most of the body’s body organs. These cells ordinarily form inside lining in the lungs, stomach, or the sac which encircles one’s heart. Thanks for revealing your ideas.

  21. I have not checked in here for some time since I thought it was getting boring, but the last several posts are great quality so I guess I’ll add you back to my everyday bloglist. You deserve it my friend 🙂

  22. I love your blog.. very nice colors & theme. Did you create this website yourself or did you hire someone to do it for you? Plz reply as I’m looking to construct my own blog and would like to find out where u got this from. appreciate it

  23. I just provided this by a coworker who was doing a little analysis on this topic and he in fact got me breakfast because I found it for him. So allow me rephrase that: Many thanks for the reward! Yet yes, thank you for spending the moment to publish material on this topic. I really feel strongly regarding it and like finding out more on this subject. Preferably, as you become know-how, would you mind upgrading your blog with even more information? It is extremely handy for me. Large thumb up for this article!

  24. Hmm is anyone else experiencing problems with the pictures on this blog loading? I’m trying to find out if its a problem on my end or if it’s the blog. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.

  25. whoah this blog is fantastic i love reading your articles. Keep up the good work! You know, a lot of people are hunting around for this info, you could help them greatly.

  26. I just couldn’t depart your web site before suggesting that I really enjoyed the standard info a person provide for your visitors? Is going to be back often to check up on new posts

  27. Thank you for every other informative web site. The place else may I am getting that type of information written in such an ideal approach? I’ve a undertaking that I am just now working on, and I have been at the look out for such info.

  28. Thanks for discussing your ideas. I’d also like to state that video games have been ever evolving. Technology advances and innovative developments have aided create realistic and active games. Most of these entertainment games were not that sensible when the actual concept was first being attempted. Just like other areas of technologies, video games too have had to evolve by many decades. This is testimony for the fast growth and development of video games.

  29. Hmm it appears like your blog ate my first comment (it was extremely long) so I guess I’ll just sum it up what I submitted and say, I’m thoroughly enjoying your blog. I as well am an aspiring blog blogger but I’m still new to the whole thing. Do you have any helpful hints for first-time blog writers? I’d really appreciate it.

  30. It is indeed my belief that mesothelioma is definitely the most deadly cancer. It has unusual features. The more I actually look at it the more I am convinced it does not act like a real solid cells cancer. In the event mesothelioma is really a rogue viral infection, so there is the prospects for developing a vaccine and offering vaccination to asbestos exposed people who are at high risk of developing upcoming asbestos linked malignancies. Thanks for expressing your ideas on this important health issue.

  31. My brother suggested I may like this web site. He was once totally right. This publish actually made my day. You cann’t consider simply how so much time I had spent for this information! Thanks!

  32. certainly like your website however you need to test the spelling on quite a few of your posts. A number of them are rife with spelling problems and I to find it very troublesome to tell the reality nevertheless I’ll certainly come again again.

  33. My brother suggested I might like this website. He used to be totally right. This post truly made my day. You can not believe simply how a lot time I had spent for this information! Thank you!

  34. obviously like your web site but you have to check the spelling on several of your posts. A number of them are rife with spelling issues and I find it very troublesome to tell the truth nevertheless I will definitely come back again.

  35. Oh my goodness! an incredible article dude. Thanks However I’m experiencing subject with ur rss . Don’t know why Unable to subscribe to it. Is there anyone getting equivalent rss problem? Anyone who knows kindly respond. Thnkx

  36. I got what you intend, appreciate it for posting .Woh I am thankful to find this website through google. “Being intelligent is not a felony, but most societies evaluate it as at least a misdemeanor.” by Lazarus Long.

  37. Hi there, I discovered your site via Google at the same time as looking for a related subject, your site got here up, it seems great. I’ve bookmarked it in my google bookmarks.

  38. One more issue is that video gaming became one of the all-time most important forms of fun for people of various age groups. Kids engage in video games, and adults do, too. The XBox 360 is among the favorite video games systems for individuals that love to have hundreds of activities available to them, in addition to who like to learn live with other people all over the world. Many thanks for sharing your ideas.

  39. There are certainly a lot of details like that to take into consideration. That is a great level to carry up. I provide the thoughts above as general inspiration however clearly there are questions just like the one you carry up the place the most important thing can be working in honest good faith. I don?t know if best practices have emerged round things like that, but I am positive that your job is clearly identified as a good game. Each boys and girls really feel the impact of just a second’s pleasure, for the rest of their lives.

  40. Someone essentially help to make seriously posts I would state. This is the first time I frequented your website page and thus far? I surprised with the research you made to create this particular publish incredible. Wonderful job!

  41. One thing I’d prefer to reply to is that weightloss program fast can be achieved by the correct diet and exercise. Your size not simply affects appearance, but also the entire quality of life. Self-esteem, depressive disorders, health risks, along with physical skills are afflicted in weight gain. It is possible to just make everything right whilst still having a gain. If this happens, a condition may be the perpetrator. While excessive food and not enough exercising are usually accountable, common medical conditions and popular prescriptions may greatly enhance size. Many thanks for your post in this article.

  42. Thanks for these guidelines. One thing I should also believe is the fact that credit cards featuring a 0 rate often bait consumers with zero interest rate, instant authorization and easy on the net balance transfers, but beware of the top factor that may void that 0 easy road annual percentage rate and throw anybody out into the poor house quick.

  43. Thanks for your write-up on the travel industry. I will also like to include that if you are one senior thinking about traveling, it can be absolutely vital that you buy travel cover for senior citizens. When traveling, retirees are at high risk of having a medical emergency. Obtaining right insurance coverage package on your age group can protect your health and give you peace of mind.

  44. I absolutely love your blog and find the majority of your post’s to be exactly I’m looking for. can you offer guest writers to write content for you personally? I wouldn’t mind producing a post or elaborating on a number of the subjects you write about here. Again, awesome site!

  45. Throughout this great design of things you get an A+ just for hard work. Where you confused me personally ended up being in the specifics. As people say, details make or break the argument.. And that couldn’t be much more true in this article. Having said that, allow me inform you what exactly did do the job. The writing can be highly convincing which is most likely the reason why I am taking the effort to comment. I do not make it a regular habit of doing that. Secondly, whilst I can notice a jumps in reason you make, I am definitely not confident of exactly how you appear to unite the details that help to make the actual conclusion. For the moment I will, no doubt subscribe to your issue however hope in the future you link the dots better.

  46. Hiya, I’m really glad I’ve found this information. Today bloggers publish only about gossips and net and this is really frustrating. A good site with exciting content, this is what I need. Thank you for keeping this website, I’ll be visiting it. Do you do newsletters? Cant find it.

  47. I just couldn’t leave your website prior to suggesting that I actually loved the usual info an individual provide for your guests? Is going to be again ceaselessly in order to inspect new posts.

  48. I was very happy to search out this net-site.I wanted to thanks on your time for this wonderful learn!! I definitely enjoying each little little bit of it and I’ve you bookmarked to check out new stuff you weblog post.

  49. Hmm it seems like your blog ate my first comment (it was extremely long) so I guess I’ll just sum it up what I had written and say, I’m thoroughly enjoying your blog. I as well am an aspiring blog blogger but I’m still new to everything. Do you have any tips and hints for novice blog writers? I’d definitely appreciate it.

  50. I like what you guys are up too. Such smart work and reporting! Keep up the excellent works guys I have incorporated you guys to my blogroll. I think it will improve the value of my site :).

  51. I was just searching for this info for some time. After 6 hours of continuous Googleing, finally I got it in your web site. I wonder what is the lack of Google strategy that don’t rank this kind of informative web sites in top of the list. Usually the top sites are full of garbage.

  52. You really make it seem so easy with your presentation but I find this topic to be really something that I think I would never understand. It seems too complex and extremely broad for me. I’m looking forward for your next post, I will try to get the hang of it!

  53. Thank you for sharing excellent informations. Your website is so cool. I am impressed by the details that you have on this website. It reveals how nicely you perceive this subject. Bookmarked this website page, will come back for extra articles. You, my friend, ROCK! I found just the information I already searched all over the place and just couldn’t come across. What an ideal website.

  54. Thanks for your post right here. One thing I would really like to say is that most professional career fields consider the Bachelor’s Degree just as the entry level standard for an online course. Though Associate College diplomas are a great way to begin, completing a person’s Bachelors uncovers many entrances to various professions, there are numerous on-line Bachelor Course Programs available coming from institutions like The University of Phoenix, Intercontinental University Online and Kaplan. Another issue is that many brick and mortar institutions offer Online types of their college diplomas but commonly for a considerably higher fee than the firms that specialize in online degree programs.

  55. I discovered your weblog site on google and examine just a few of your early posts. Proceed to keep up the very good operate. I just further up your RSS feed to my MSN News Reader. In search of ahead to studying more from you afterward!…

  56. I’m curious to find out what blog platform you have been working with? I’m having some minor security problems with my latest site and I’d like to find something more risk-free. Do you have any suggestions?

  57. Hey there! I’ve been reading your web site for some time now and finally got the bravery to go ahead and give you a shout out from Lubbock Tx! Just wanted to mention keep up the great work!

  58. Yesterday, while I was at work, my cousin stole my iphone and tested to see if it can survive a twenty five foot drop, just so she can be a youtube sensation. My apple ipad is now destroyed and she has 83 views. I know this is entirely off topic but I had to share it with someone!

  59. Thank you for another great article. The place else could anyone get that kind of information in such an ideal way of writing? I’ve a presentation subsequent week, and I’m at the look for such information.

  60. Throughout the awesome scheme of things you actually receive an A with regard to hard work. Where exactly you misplaced everybody was on all the facts. As they say, details make or break the argument.. And it could not be more correct here. Having said that, let me tell you just what did give good results. The authoring is very engaging and this is most likely why I am taking an effort in order to comment. I do not make it a regular habit of doing that. 2nd, whilst I can easily see a leaps in reason you come up with, I am not necessarily confident of exactly how you appear to connect your ideas which make the final result. For now I will, no doubt yield to your position but hope in the future you actually link the facts better.

  61. Attractive section of content. I just stumbled upon your web site and in accession capital to assert that I get actually enjoyed account your blog posts. Anyway I will be subscribing to your augment and even I achievement you access consistently rapidly.

  62. We’re a group of volunteers and starting a new scheme in our community. Your web site offered us with valuable info to work on. You have done an impressive job and our whole community will be thankful to you.

  63. My wife and i were absolutely thankful that Raymond managed to carry out his basic research because of the precious recommendations he got while using the web site. It is now and again perplexing just to always be offering techniques which usually other folks have been making money from. So we understand we’ve got you to appreciate for this. All of the explanations you’ve made, the simple website menu, the friendships you make it easier to foster – it’s all awesome, and it is aiding our son in addition to our family feel that that situation is interesting, which is certainly extraordinarily vital. Many thanks for everything!

  64. With almost everything that appears to be developing inside this specific area, all your opinions tend to be relatively exciting. On the other hand, I appologize, because I do not give credence to your whole theory, all be it refreshing none the less. It looks to everyone that your commentary are actually not entirely validated and in fact you are generally yourself not even completely convinced of the argument. In any case I did take pleasure in looking at it.

  65. Fantastic goods from you, man. I have understand your stuff previous to and you are just too great. I actually like what you’ve acquired here, really like what you are saying and the way in which you say it. You make it enjoyable and you still care for to keep it smart. I cant wait to read much more from you. This is really a terrific website.

  66. Good day! This is my 1st comment here so I just wanted to give a quick shout out and say I really enjoy reading your blog posts. Can you recommend any other blogs/websites/forums that deal with the same subjects? Thanks!

  67. Good post. I learn something more difficult on totally different blogs everyday. It would all the time be stimulating to read content from different writers and observe a little something from their store. I’d prefer to make use of some with the content on my weblog whether or not you don’t mind. Natually I’ll give you a hyperlink on your web blog. Thanks for sharing.

  68. Thank you for every one of your labor on this blog. Kim really loves doing research and it is obvious why. My spouse and i learn all about the compelling ways you render very helpful techniques via this web site and as well improve contribution from other individuals about this article so our princess is always discovering a lot. Have fun with the remaining portion of the year. You’re conducting a really great job.

  69. Oh my goodness! an amazing article dude. Thank you Nevertheless I’m experiencing issue with ur rss . Don’t know why Unable to subscribe to it. Is there anyone getting equivalent rss downside? Anyone who is aware of kindly respond. Thnkx

  70. Thanks for the helpful posting. It is also my belief that mesothelioma has an incredibly long latency phase, which means that signs of the disease may well not emerge until finally 30 to 50 years after the initial exposure to asbestos fiber. Pleural mesothelioma, that’s the most common type and has effects on the area round the lungs, could cause shortness of breath, chest pains, including a persistent coughing, which may result in coughing up our blood.

  71. Greetings! I know this is somewhat off topic but I was wondering if you knew where I could locate a captcha plugin for my comment form? I’m using the same blog platform as yours and I’m having difficulty finding one? Thanks a lot!

  72. you are truly a just right webmaster. The web site loading speed is incredible. It sort of feels that you are doing any unique trick. Furthermore, The contents are masterpiece. you’ve done a magnificent job in this matter!

  73. I discovered your weblog site on google and check a few of your early posts. Continue to maintain up the excellent operate. I simply further up your RSS feed to my MSN News Reader. Searching for forward to studying more from you afterward!…

  74. Nice blog here! Also your web site quite a bit up very fast! What web host are you the use of? Can I get your associate link for your host? I desire my site loaded up as quickly as yours lol

  75. You actually make it appear really easy together with your presentation however I find this topic to be actually something which I feel I would never understand. It sort of feels too complex and very broad for me. I’m looking ahead for your subsequent submit, I’ll try to get the cling of it!

  76. What i don’t realize is if truth be told how you’re no longer really much more well-appreciated than you may be right now. You are so intelligent. You already know thus considerably in terms of this topic, made me in my opinion believe it from a lot of numerous angles. Its like men and women don’t seem to be interested except it’s one thing to do with Lady gaga! Your personal stuffs great. All the time handle it up!

  77. I was just looking for this info for some time. After 6 hours of continuous Googleing, finally I got it in your web site. I wonder what’s the lack of Google strategy that do not rank this kind of informative web sites in top of the list. Normally the top web sites are full of garbage.

  78. Oh my goodness! an amazing article dude. Thanks However I’m experiencing situation with ur rss . Don’t know why Unable to subscribe to it. Is there anybody getting an identical rss problem? Anyone who is aware of kindly respond. Thnkx

  79. Thank you for sharing superb informations. Your website is very cool. I am impressed by the details that you have on this site. It reveals how nicely you perceive this subject. Bookmarked this website page, will come back for extra articles. You, my pal, ROCK! I found simply the information I already searched all over the place and just could not come across. What a great site.

  80. I have to express some appreciation to the writer just for rescuing me from this type of dilemma. Just after looking out through the search engines and obtaining techniques that were not pleasant, I believed my life was over. Existing without the presence of answers to the issues you’ve sorted out through your entire guideline is a crucial case, as well as those which could have in a wrong way damaged my career if I hadn’t come across the website. The talents and kindness in touching all the details was very helpful. I don’t know what I would have done if I had not encountered such a point like this. I can at this point look ahead to my future. Thank you very much for the high quality and results-oriented help. I won’t be reluctant to recommend your site to anyone who needs guidelines about this matter.

  81. I have been absent for a while, but now I remember why I used to love this website. Thank you, I will try and check back more frequently. How frequently you update your website?

  82. Good – I should definitely pronounce, impressed with your web site. I had no trouble navigating through all tabs and related info ended up being truly easy to do to access. I recently found what I hoped for before you know it in the least. Quite unusual. Is likely to appreciate it for those who add forums or something, website theme . a tones way for your customer to communicate. Excellent task.

  83. What i do not understood is in reality how you’re no longer really a lot more smartly-favored than you may be now. You’re very intelligent. You know therefore considerably in terms of this topic, produced me in my view imagine it from a lot of numerous angles. Its like men and women are not fascinated unless it is one thing to accomplish with Woman gaga! Your own stuffs outstanding. At all times deal with it up!

  84. Hello, Neat post. There’s an issue together with your website in internet explorer, could check this… IE nonetheless is the marketplace leader and a big section of other people will pass over your great writing because of this problem.

  85. We are a group of volunteers and opening a brand new scheme in our community. Your site offered us with valuable info to work on. You’ve done an impressive activity and our whole group will be grateful to you.

  86. Hello there! This is kind of off topic but I need some advice from an established blog. Is it hard to set up your own blog? I’m not very techincal but I can figure things out pretty fast. I’m thinking about setting up my own but I’m not sure where to begin. Do you have any tips or suggestions? Appreciate it

  87. I’m very happy to read this. This is the type of manual that needs to be given and not the random misinformation that is at the other blogs. Appreciate your sharing this greatest doc.

  88. Wow! This can be one particular of the most useful blogs We have ever arrive across on this subject. Actually Wonderful. I’m also a specialist in this topic so I can understand your effort.

  89. It’s perfect time to make some plans for the future and it’s time to be happy. I’ve read this post and if I could I wish to suggest you some interesting things or suggestions. Maybe you could write next articles referring to this article. I desire to read more things about it!

  90. fantastic issues altogether, you just won a logo new reader. What may you suggest about your put up that you made some days in the past? Any positive?

  91. Great – I should definitely pronounce, impressed with your web site. I had no trouble navigating through all the tabs as well as related information ended up being truly simple to do to access. I recently found what I hoped for before you know it at all. Quite unusual. Is likely to appreciate it for those who add forums or something, web site theme . a tones way for your customer to communicate. Nice task.

  92. I am really impressed with your writing talents and also with the structure to your blog. Is that this a paid subject matter or did you customize it your self? Anyway stay up the excellent quality writing, it’s uncommon to look a nice weblog like this one nowadays..

  93. Great – I should definitely pronounce, impressed with your web site. I had no trouble navigating through all the tabs and related info ended up being truly simple to do to access. I recently found what I hoped for before you know it at all. Quite unusual. Is likely to appreciate it for those who add forums or something, website theme . a tones way for your customer to communicate. Excellent task.

  94. Hey there just wanted to give you a brief heads up and let you know a few of the images aren’t loading correctly. I’m not sure why but I think its a linking issue. I’ve tried it in two different browsers and both show the same outcome.

  95. Thanks for sharing excellent informations. Your site is very cool. I am impressed by the details that you have on this blog. It reveals how nicely you understand this subject. Bookmarked this web page, will come back for more articles. You, my friend, ROCK! I found simply the information I already searched all over the place and simply could not come across. What a perfect web site.

  96. In these days of austerity along with relative panic about having debt, most people balk resistant to the idea of using a credit card in order to make acquisition of merchandise and also pay for any gift giving occasion, preferring, instead only to rely on this tried and also trusted technique of making repayment – raw cash. However, if you possess cash on hand to make the purchase 100 %, then, paradoxically, this is the best time for you to use the card for several good reasons.

  97. I haven’t checked in here for some time since I thought it was getting boring, but the last few posts are great quality so I guess I will add you back to my daily bloglist. You deserve it my friend 🙂

  98. Fantastic post however , I was wanting to know if you could write a litte more on this subject? I’d be very grateful if you could elaborate a little bit more. Thank you!

  99. One more thing I would like to state is that as an alternative to trying to fit all your online degree programs on days of the week that you conclude work (since the majority of people are drained when they go back home), try to arrange most of your lessons on the weekends and only a few courses for weekdays, even if it means taking some time away from your saturday and sunday. This pays off because on the saturdays and sundays, you will be much more rested in addition to concentrated upon school work. Thx for the different tips I have learned from your web site.

  100. I simply wanted to make a brief note so as to appreciate you for all of the stunning tactics you are giving at this website. My considerable internet investigation has finally been rewarded with useful strategies to go over with my friends and classmates. I would say that many of us readers actually are truly lucky to live in a great network with so many marvellous people with insightful things. I feel quite happy to have encountered your web pages and look forward to some more entertaining minutes reading here. Thanks a lot once more for everything.

  101. Hi there, I found your web site via Google at the same time as searching for a similar matter, your site came up, it looks great. I’ve bookmarked it in my google bookmarks.

  102. I truly wanted to post a brief message so as to express gratitude to you for the marvelous techniques you are giving out here. My time-consuming internet search has now been recognized with really good points to write about with my good friends. I would say that many of us visitors actually are unquestionably lucky to exist in a really good site with so many outstanding professionals with beneficial ideas. I feel very privileged to have come across your webpages and look forward to plenty of more fun moments reading here. Thanks a lot once more for a lot of things.

  103. However, you could possibly soon learn that everything said to be free usually are not necessarily beneficial to you. On a similar note, you should be sure that his or her bank will allow the pay outs being received at his / her bank. Playing at free casinos online can sharpen your gambling skills because you can play casino games without risking your money.

  104. You are my aspiration, I own few blogs and infrequently run out from post :). “Fiat justitia et pereat mundus.Let justice be done, though the world perish.” by Ferdinand I.

  105. Hello, I think your website might be having browser compatibility issues. When I look at your blog in Safari, it looks fine but when opening in Internet Explorer, it has some overlapping. I just wanted to give you a quick heads up! Other then that, terrific blog!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *